What Connection Can Be Made Between Europe's Treatment

Update Jan seven, 2022: The numbers in the Kingdom of denmark written report described below are at present confirmed by government data from Frg showing that vaccinated people are 8X more than likely to develop Omicron than unvaccinated people. This is non surprising since a newspaper from Germany showed the same thing: the more you vaccinate, the worse it gets.

Worried about Omicron? Gauge what? After 90 days, the vaccine they gave you is going to make you More than likely to go infected from Omicron, non less. The longer you stay on the vaccine treadmill, the harder to get off in the hereafter and the easier you'll make it for the virus.

In short, we've been lied to most the vaccine. Information technology is protecting you less and less over fourth dimension. While y'all may get a benefit for earlier variants, the do good for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to exist negative. In brusk, you are getting a short term do good against Delta, only at the expense of a degradation of your overall immunity to everything else.

These vaccines may assistance you win the war against a variant that may soon be rare, just the price you pay is that you brand your immunity to everything else worse. It'southward a impaired tradeoff (especially since early treatments work so well). But the people making the laws won't believe whatever of the science referenced in this article, and so it will continue.

Alix Mayer alerted me to this game irresolute tweet about a study in Denmark which instantly went viral as you can come across from the number of retweets:

I desire to tell you what this really means and how it is being attacked.

Summary: Refuse to comply with mandates. At present.

This paper ways we will demand to inject people every xxx days if nosotros want to "protect" them. Based on the harm that the vaccines practice to our immune arrangement, it's likely that the needed interval will shorten with each booster.

If people don't get boosted as required, they will be MORE vulnerable to Delta and Omicron than if they weren't vaccinated. That'southward what NEGATIVE vaccine efficacy means. Information technology doesn't hateful the protection wears off (like we were told). It means the Reverse of what y'all were told: it ways the vaccines helps the virus to infect you (by suppressing your immune system, probably permanently each time we are injected according to Dr. Ryan Cole). It ways we were lied to.

In short, the vaccine is like a heroin habit: once you've had a taste of information technology, you are hooked: y'all have to continue information technology for life if y'all want protection. If you stop it, you're a sitting duck for the virus.

What'south worse is our government is mandating this now. In light of this paper, they will modify the vaccine mandates to forcefulness you to get vaccinated every month or you will be fired from your task. Their adjacent move could well be to get in illegal not to exist vaccinated. This seems like where things are headed based on what is happening in other countries where they are quickly stripping abroad your rights to do anything without a vaccination.

And we have no clue what monthly (and afterward weekly) vaccination volition practise to your body. This has never been tested.

My advice is simple. If you lot have been vaccinated, you need to terminate now. Practice not become the booster. My friend Dr. Robert Malone is fond of repeating the old aphorism, "When you find yourself in a hole, terminate excavation ."

Sadly, about people cannot beget to lose their jobs, and so they will get vaccinated and medical professionals will non speak out since doing so will crusade them to lose their license.

The faster, safer, lower toll manner to cease the pandemic

Everyone needs to stop listening to the CDC now and offset listening to people who accept been saying to ditch the vaccines and aggressively promote early treatment with repurposed drugs.

The entire pandemic volition stop as before long as the CDC stops ignoring the existing early treatment protocols which have been available since March 2022 (Fareed and Tyson protocol was beginning available back then). Masking, vaccines, mandates, lockdowns, and social distancing were never needed. We could take (and still can) end the hospitalization and death with merely one thing: early treatment. Just similar Japan has washed. Merely the CDC refused to listen.

What the paper said in item

First, the link in the tweet is to the outdated version of the paper. The current version tin can be plant here.

Starting time at the comments, both from social media and also from medrxiv readers.

Check out the social media portion of the comments

Here are some comments (on one-time and new version of the paper):

• So assume the results you like (high VE for recent vaccination) are causal, but hand wave confounders at results yous don't like (negative VE for distant vaccination)? Science?

• This is a superb paper, especially the conscientious approach to CNV calling and the Bayesian methods used throughout.

• Looking at the graphs, I see both vaccines lose all effectiveness at xc days, but worse, actually drop into strong negative effectiveness subsequently that fourth dimension.

  This would mean that these vaccines *increment* one's chances of infection after the initial xc days "honeymoon" period.

  Am I getting this correct?

  If so, why are governments pushing tertiary doses as Omicron is becoming dominant?

The key material is in the total PDF:

The graphs above tell the story. Negative VE means the vaccine is helping the virus, not y'all.

Then at 60 days, the protection is close to nil, so if y'all want to maintain protection, getting vaccinated every 30 days is required.

This isn't a vaccine at all. This is basically stimulating your immune system then information technology is already "geared up" to fight the virus. That's not what a vaccine is supposed to practise.

Furthermore, the negative VE afterwards 90 days means you are hooked for life and I would estimate (based on the mechanism of action), that we volition need shorter and shorter dosing intervals for every booster y'all get (since it kills off your immune arrangement every time).

And so it could very well be monthly boosters later the 2nd dose, weekly boosters after the 3rd dose, and peradventure daily boosters after the 4th dose to maintain your "immunity."

You tin can't stop after that because if yous cease, you're in worse shape than if y'all never started.

The stunning conclusion of the paper

In light of the exponential rising in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.

All I can say is "wow." The people who wrote this paper are clearly drinking the Kool-Aid on their interpretation of what their study means.

They likewise wrote this (which is purely speculative with no data behind information technology as noted in the italics were my addition):

The negative estimates in the final period arguably suggest dissimilar behaviour and/or exposure patterns in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts causing underestimation of the VE. This was likely the result of Omicron spreading rapidly initially through single (super-spreading) events causing many infections among immature, vaccinated individuals.

This paper should be a wake up telephone call: the vaccines practise non work. Stop repeating the insanity.

Early on treatments like the Fareed and Tyson protocol are 10X better than any new therapy, they don't "hook you," and they don't crusade inability or decease.

If doctors started prescribing the Fareed and Tyson protocol, we'd take well-nigh no deaths, and few hospitalizations. But they can't do that since medical board will have abroad the licenses of any physicians who prescribe ivermectin, etc. This is happening at present.

We are in this mess because the NIH, CDC, FDA are decadent and incompetent and they volition non concur themselves answerable in an open argue. This has been going on for 20 years in the vaccine space… information technology's nix new. The book "Evidence of harm" documents all of this. Kirby was deliberately neutral in his presentation (being non-judgmental like reporters are supposed to exist), but whatever neutral thinking person volition side against the authorities.

Why the paper went viral

And then, the reason this newspaper went viral is because

1. It is well done,

2. Information technology was done by PhDs in infectious disease and epidemiology,

3. The results prove what is actually happening, and

4. Nobody has been able to attack the newspaper with a credible argument, even on Twitter.

5. It confirms what my team of experts has been saying about negative VE

Here are some of the ridiculous attempts to discredit the newspaper:

Supporting evidence

The paper isn't a fluke. There is lots of other evidence in support of the negative VE (and not supporting their speculative caption for it).

Hither's the data from Canada which shows that we take it backwards. We should be mandating "no vaccines" in order to proceed your task and burn down all the vaccinated people because these people are the most risky.

In Ontario in the last few days, cases per capita amidst the vaccinated have skyrocketed above cases per capita among the unvaccinated. Clearly, mandates are nonsensical at this point, because the entire case for restricting unvaccinated people is their presumed higher per capita infection rate.

Here'southward the UK data showing the same matter. We need to flip around the mandates ASAP.

Other supporting data:

1. On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable show of their causative role in deaths afterward vaccination and the video about that paper. If the vaccines don't impale yous, they will go out you weaker. Over xc% of the deaths investigated later on vaccination were found to have been caused past the vaccines. In that location is no other explanation.

2. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses
   An excellent article past Jessica Rose which explains the underlying mechanism for why we are seeing the effect that the more than y'all vaccinate, the more than you make things worse for people. The vaccine damages both your adaptive and innate immune systems.

3. Vaccine efficacy declines to be negative in the UK (Expose article)

4. Booster protection fades inside 10 weeks against Omicron: Britain study

5. Booster shots protect against symptomatic Omicron infection for almost ten weeks, report finds — which could mean more doses for some in 2022

6. This substack article looks at the Danish report (described hither) and the UK data. Note that the VE numbers in the two studies are different because if you divide our Omicron, you get a very dissimilar moving-picture show of VE compared to analyses that don't split out VE by variant.

7. Dr. Ron Brown – Opinion Editorial

   December 23, 2021

   Ontario, Canada reported 5,790 new COVID-xix cases on Thursday, December 23, 2021, setting the province'due south i-day record for new cases since the beginning of the pandemic: Ontario: Case numbers | COVID-19. Th's numbers include 971 unvaccinated new cases compared to iv,392 fully vaccinated new cases—a rapidly rising trend over the past several weeks conspicuously showing that most new cases are now occurring in fully vaccinated people.

Please aid u.s.a. to spread the word by sharing this article on social media.

piazzastoody.blogspot.com

Source: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-vaccines-must-be

Share this post